By M. A. R. Habib
This entire advisor to the historical past of literary feedback from antiquity to the current day presents an authoritative evaluate of the main hobbies, figures, and texts of literary feedback, in addition to surveying their cultural, historic, and philosophical contexts.Supplies the cultural, old and philosophical history to the literary feedback of every period allows scholars to determine the improvement of literary feedback in contextOrganised chronologically, from classical literary feedback via to deconstruction Considers a variety of thinkers and occasions from the French Revolution to Freud’s perspectives on civilization can be utilized along any anthology of literary feedback or as a coherent stand-alone creation
Read or Download A History of Literary Criticism and Theory: From Plato to the Present PDF
Best criticism & theory books
The try out of western literature has normally been Is it actual? Is it actual? genuine? the result's a regular whatever yet literary, as Nathaniel Lewis observes during this bold paintings, a wholesale rethinking of the severe phrases and contexts—and therefore of the very nature—of western writing. Why is western writing nearly lacking from the yankee literary canon yet a widespread good fortune available on the market?
This research examines Eiseley's impression as a philosopher and author. greatly sought after for his or her poetic prose and mixture of literary and medical pursuits, Eiseley's texts additionally include an epistemological quest for a discussion of the analytical medical procedure and the intuitive, synthesizing insights of literature.
Postcolonial Literatures in Context is a transparent, available and concise creation to postcolonial literatures in English (and English translation) and their wider contexts. It starts by means of introducing key matters interested by the research of postcolonial literature together with outdated and new diasporas, postcolonial nationalisms, indigenous identities and politics and globalization.
Glassary is a spouse quantity to Glas. It deals English readers fuller entry to the masterwork of Jacques Derrida, the major thinker in France.
Derrida is critical for his investigations of language, philosophy, and writing. He has perforated the limits among educational disciplines, has validated the theological underpinnings of it seems that atheological philosophies, and has thrown into query conventional notions in regards to the "ownership" of principles. Glas exemplifies Derrida's method of interpreting and his important philosophical and literary matters. The reader excited about its complexities will take pleasure in the help of Glassary. Written by means of the executive translator of Glas, John P. Leavey, Jr. , it comprises an essay by way of Gregory Ulmer and a foreword via Jacques Derrida.
- The Culture and Commerce of the American Short Story
- The brothers Karamazov: notes
- Sanity Plea: Schizophrenia in the Novels of Kurt Vonnegut
- The music of thought in the poetry of George Oppen and William Bronk
- New Essays on Light in August (The American Novel)
Extra resources for A History of Literary Criticism and Theory: From Plato to the Present
Hence the guardians’ nature must achieve a harmony between both dispositions, high-spiritedness on the one hand, and gentleness, together with a love of knowledge, on the other. Plato’s terminology here is revealing: such a guardian would be “the most perfect and harmonious musician” (III, 410c–412a). 27 HOLC01b 27 06/27/2005, 10:50 AM part i: ancient greek criticism This terminology enables us better to understand just how Plato conceives of poetry as an ideologically destabilizing force. The harmony in the soul of the guardian is not innate; it is achieved only by long training and ideological inculcation.
Throughout the ostensible “dialogue,” Ion acts as the willing and naive tool of Socrates’ own perspective, unwittingly dragged through the implications of his own initial boast that he “of all men . . [has] the finest things to say on Homer” (Ion, 530c). Characteristically, Socrates’ strategy is not to contradict this statement directly but to unfold various contexts in whose light the connections between the constituent elements of Ion’s claim very precisely emerge as absurd. Ion’s claim is strangely self-limited: he claims to recite and interpret only one poet, Homer, and to be ignorant of and indifferent to the work of other poets (Ion, 531a).
This general charge against poetry is elucidated in book X. Once again, it is an index of how deeply poetry structures the entire discussion that this final book is devoted not 31 HOLC01b 31 06/27/2005, 10:50 AM part i: ancient greek criticism to justice or polity but to poetry. Socrates, perhaps shaky in his conviction of his own earlier arguments, returns to give second thoughts to the subject – with the biased intention of convincing himself more deeply. Using the dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon, Plato now presents the poet as a “most marvelous Sophist” and a “truly clever and wondrous man” who “makes all the things that all handicraftsmen severally produce” (X, 596c–d).